-
Deadline for Special Issue
Since my last post about the JWSRspecial issue on the Web Services Architecture, we had a couple of requests for extension. So I think that it’s only fair to give an extension to everyone. However, due to the tight schedule for the reviewing process we can only allow for an extra week. New deadline for…
-
Stateful services (yes, again!)
There was a question on “stateful Web Services” over at the w3c-ws mailing list. Of course, I couldn’t resist not making a comment 🙂 However, I used a politically incorrect phrase about the demise of OGSI (“miserable failure”) and I think that got me in trouble again 🙁 I should really be more careful!
-
Yes, WSE 2.1 please!
Please Microsoft. As Clemenssays, we need WSE 2.1 with an updated version of WS-Addressing to match the current spec. I’ve stopped my WS-Eventing implementation because of that reason.
-
On wsa:action
While reading the 3rd part of the factored WS-Addressing spec, it occurred to me that the discussion on how to associate wsa:action headers with messages in WSDL operations or how to implicitly generate them could be simplified by having just a uniform action for all SOAP messages: wsa:action=”process:message” Anything more in the action header may…
-
Bill on “ABOUT / HTTP/1.2”
This is an interesting post by Bill de hOra.
-
“Can OO be SO?” by Tim Ewald
Commenting on Clemens Vasters‘ post, to which I linked in my previous entry, Tim Ewald remembers (“Can OO be SO?“) that at the last PDC someone had asked Don Box about the use of EPRs as CORBA IORs 🙂 Back then (October 2003) rumours were surfacing about some work IBM and the Globus team were…
-
I am not alone after all
Here’s a post by Clemens Vasters saying what I’ve been saying for some time about the use of WS-Addressing as an object pointer 🙂
-
Deadline for the special edition is coming
The deadline for the special edition on Web Services Architecture of the Journal of Web Services Research is very close now. If you are thinking of submitting a paper but would like some more time, please drop me or Jim a line.
-
Protocol independence comments by Steve Maine
There is a very good discussion taking place between Steve (post 1, post 2) and Mark (post 1, post 2). I agree with Steve on most points, except the need for an action header 🙂