-
Umbilical brothers
This is very funny. From Lindsay.
-
On “document-oriented messages” (whatever that means)
This post from Mark Nottingham is an interesting read.I particularly liked this: Why do Web services folks think it’s OK for end users to use XML Schema if it isn’t good enough for describing WSDL? (Referring to the WSDL WG’s…
-
from WS-I BP v1.0 to v1.1
Chris Ferris explains the changes from WS-I BP v1.0 to v1.1
-
Notes on service-orientation and currest state of WS-* specs, or… I think I am going to join the REST of them
Where is the Web Services world going to? I originally thought (wished) that Web Services technologies would be governed by the principles of service-orientation. I thought we were trying to realise an architecture where the focus was the service and…
-
Downtime warning!
There is going to be a complete power down over the weekend in our machine room to allow for some essential electrical work to take place. Power may be restored as early as Saturday or as late as Monday morning…
-
WS-Addressing and WS-MessageDelivery in W3C
Hmmm… I am starting to suspect that the big companies already have a secret plan. Two submissions to W3C for specifications on how to address Web Services (WS-Addressing and WS-MD)? Surely, the consortium will not allow for two competing groups…
-
Versioning in an XML world
I don’t think I’ve ever linked to David Orchard‘s great article on “Versioning XML Vocabularies”. I got reminded of it while reading “Designing Extensible, Versionable XML Formats” by Dare Obasanjo.
-
Jim on WebServices.org
WebServices.org has changed look. It also has a great line up of new contributors; amongst them, my best pal and colleague Jim. His first article is entitled “Web Services: REST in Peace?” which as always is a great read and…
-
W3C WSDL 2.0 last call for comments
Back from holidays, back to base! Backlog of messages cleared, still going through backlog of blog entries. The W3CWSDL working group has published the working drafts for WSDL 2.0 part 1, part 2, and part 3. We have till 4…
-
Time for a break
Hey everyone… It’s time for a break. I am going to switch off completely for 7 days, so no blogging. Santorini is our destination. I’ve already been there twice but that was 13 and 12 years ago 🙂 It’s such…
-
A very good, high-level overview of service-orientation
This article on “Service Orientation and Its Role in Your Connected Systems Strategy” by Microsoft‘s Mike Burner is an excellent overview of service-orientation. I fully subscribe to these views. In the middle of the article there is a discussion of…
-
The boys are fighting again…
– “No, mine is better” – “But you didn’t measure yours fairly” 🙂 Sun published a paper on the performance of J2EE vs .Net for SOAP processing and Microsoftresponded by replicating the same tests.
-
Please everyone, repeat after me… there are NO OBJECTS in service-orientation
At least there are no objects that we can see. Objects may be used in an implementation of a service but there are no objects in the architecture (either remote or local). In a post that seems to miss this…
-
Services… are they the evolution of components? And… “stateless” vs “stateful” again.
In a previous post I mentioned Jim‘s thoughts on the transition from objects, to components, and now services. His post generated some interesting comments and an entry in Stefan‘s blog. Stefan wrote that …a component has a contract not only…
-
Comega
Jim blogged about Xen and recommended the “Programming with Rectangles, Triangles, and Circles” paper, which is really interesting. I have been following the development of “Xen”, then “X#”, and now “Comega” for some time. Few months ago I attended the…