-
Mark responds but we still disagree
Mark Baker comments on my recent entry about operation names in SOAP messages. After talking to Jim for a bit, I realised that my comments didn’t come out in the way I intended. So, just to clarify… It’s not that I was objecting on services mapping messages to operations. That’s entirely their business. I was…
-
Steve Vinoski on WS-Addressing, WS-Events, and WS-Eventing
You can find a link to his IEEE Internet Computing article from Steve Vinoski’sblog entry.
-
Swiss Army Knife with USB flash memory!
🙂 As this article suggests, it was about to happen.
-
I am today’s “Web Services super-hero” 🙂
Jim just declared me “today’s Web Services super-hero” 🙂 We’ve been having interesting discussions here in Berlin during GGF10. Talking to the main people behind WSRF has been good. I am still not persuaded with their arguments. If anything, I am more confident that we are on the right track with our conceptual model and…
-
Putting the operation name in body of a SOAP message
Mark Baker talks about the WSDL WG’s decision not to require the name of an operation in the body of a SOAP message. I personally think that this is good. Web Services are all about exchanging information and not identifying methods, operations, functions, procedures that must be called. What services do with the information they…
-
Jim and I are in Berlin!
Jim just posted a photo of us hard at work 🙂
-
Potential implications of Web Services standards to SAP
From LooselyCoupled, a link to a report on the financial implications of Web Services standards to SAP’s business. Here’s the post.
-
WS-MetadataExchange
The WS-MetadataExchange specification has finally appeared. I haven’t read it yet but I’ve been waiting for its release. It’s written by the usual suspects (IBM, MS, BEA… oh and SAP!). Found it through this post by Mark Baker.
-
Looking for a new name for my blog
I am going to be updating the blog engine in the next few weeks and the look and feel of the web version of this blog in preparation for a shared blog with Jim (hopefully that will happen). “Blahg” was always going to be a temporary name so I am accepting suggestions for a name.…
-
Jim is blogging
Jim didn’t say anything to me but he has started blogging! There are few entries there already that, typically of Jim, provide excellent insight into Web Services technology and his current work. He’s not running a blog engine yet, so there is no feed to subscribe. I am travelling tomorrow all day so I will…