• Downtime warning!

    There is going to be a complete power down over the weekend in our machine room to allow for some essential electrical work to take place. Power may be restored as early as Saturday or as late as Monday morning (UK time). As a result, Jim‘s and my blogs/sites and the WS-GAF site will be…

    Read more →

  • WS-Addressing and WS-MessageDelivery in W3C

    Hmmm… I am starting to suspect that the big companies already have a secret plan. Two submissions to W3C for specifications on how to address Web Services (WS-Addressing and WS-MD)? Surely, the consortium will not allow for two competing groups to be formed (I surely hope not). It seems that they will all get together…

    Read more →

  • Versioning in an XML world

    I don’t think I’ve ever linked to David Orchard‘s great article on “Versioning XML Vocabularies”. I got reminded of it while reading “Designing Extensible, Versionable XML Formats” by Dare Obasanjo.

    Read more →

  • Jim on WebServices.org

    WebServices.org has changed look. It also has a great line up of new contributors; amongst them, my best pal and colleague Jim. His first article is entitled “Web Services: REST in Peace?” which as always is a great read and highly recommended. Please note that the link to this article from Jim‘s most recent post…

    Read more →

  • W3C WSDL 2.0 last call for comments

    Back from holidays, back to base! Backlog of messages cleared, still going through backlog of blog entries. The W3CWSDL working group has published the working drafts for WSDL 2.0 part 1, part 2, and part 3. We have till 4 October 2004 to submit comments. Good reading everyone!

    Read more →

  • Time for a break

    Hey everyone… It’s time for a break. I am going to switch off completely for 7 days, so no blogging. Santorini is our destination. I’ve already been there twice but that was 13 and 12 years ago 🙂 It’s such a great place! See you in a week!

    Read more →

  • A very good, high-level overview of service-orientation

    This article on “Service Orientation and Its Role in Your Connected Systems Strategy” by Microsoft‘s Mike Burner is an excellent overview of service-orientation. I fully subscribe to these views. In the middle of the article there is a discussion of Microsoft‘s related technologies which you can skip if you are not interested. Highly recommended read.

    Read more →

  • The boys are fighting again…

    – “No, mine is better” – “But you didn’t measure yours fairly” 🙂 Sun published a paper on the performance of J2EE vs .Net for SOAP processing and Microsoftresponded by replicating the same tests.

    Read more →

  • Please everyone, repeat after me… there are NO OBJECTS in service-orientation

    At least there are no objects that we can see. Objects may be used in an implementation of a service but there are no objects in the architecture (either remote or local). In a post that seems to miss this point, Sean Landis talks about “SOAs – Separating Hype from Reality”. Here’s a quote from…

    Read more →

  • Services… are they the evolution of components? And… “stateless” vs “stateful” again.

    In a previous post I mentioned Jim‘s thoughts on the transition from objects, to components, and now services. His post generated some interesting comments and an entry in Stefan‘s blog. Stefan wrote that …a component has a contract not only with the outside world, but also with the component platform into which it is deployed……

    Read more →