I have been trying to persuade Jim to let me blog about our book for some time now. I thought that by blogging about our book-related efforts, we’d be forced to keep up with our self-imposed (but so far not met) deadlines (I am very much the culprit on this one). It turns out that he let it slip when he posted a comment on Stefan‘s “REST vs WS Statistics”. BTW, Mark‘s suggestion that Jim and I are the same person was very funny 🙂 although I can’t believe that such a mistake could ever be made… <self-sarcasm>I am clearly so much better looking</self-sarcasm>:-)
Well, you can consider this post as my public commitment.
We have already written the proposal for a “let’s analyze this Web-based integration phenomenon book” and it has received good comments. Expect a book with a strong taste of HTTP, some REST aroma, a small touch of message-orientation, garnish of Web Services, a leaf of semantics and knowledge representation (if I get my way :-), lots of syndication, and much more (I don’t want to spoil it for you by revealing all the ideas :-). That should make a good recipe for, what we think, is going to be an interesting and much needed book for a world where the Web is the application/integration platform.
Last week, I wrote about the evolution of the CVOYA Graph. After a lot of…
Last year, I released the "Graph Model" library for .NET as an open source project. It…
Today I'm pushing Spring Voyage out of the harbor. You can track its journey on…
In my last post, I wrote that "the typing of code was parallelized and delegated.…
In February, I wrote about the small team I'd stood up instead of hiring humans:…
Assembling a dream team without a single hire I've been making great progress on CVOYA's…