I’ve been looking at synchronization-related concepts lately. It’s been really nice to revisit some ideas/concepts from my PhD years (e.g. consistency models for shared data in distributed environments). ‘Optimistic concurrency’ is a term I’ve encountered a lot and I just read the “Optimistic concurrency – a false panacea” post by Yaro Goland (via Mark Baker). Interesting!
I am not going to try to disagree with the arguments since I am just learning this area and I don’t have the much needed real world experience 🙂 However, I would like to point out that I’ve encountered systems where optimistic concurrency works relatively well (always apply the right tool for the right job!). A couple of examples come in mind: Active Directory and Windows Server Distributed File System. Granted, these are not transactions systems but they do optimistically propagate updates given their multi-owner nature for shared data. Perhaps I am not comparing similar things.
A good paper to read is “Optimistic Replication” by Saito and Shapiro.
See "BrainExpanded - Introduction" for context on this post. Notes and links Over the years,…
This is the first post, in what I think is going to be a series,…
Back in February, I shared the results of some initial experimentation with a digital twin.…
I am embarking on a side project that involves memory and multimodal understanding for an…
I was in Toronto, Canada. I'm on the flight back home now. The trip was…