According to Mark Baker most developers (85% vs 15%) will use the HTTP-based mechanisms for accessing the Amazon S3 service. This is because the “SOAP interface is comical”. I won’t try to support Amazon‘s design. That’s their job. I would like to make a comment from a developer’s point of view.
As much as I dislike WSDL because of its use of the ‘interface’ and ‘operation’ abstractions, it still represents a technology in the Web Services metadata space which doesn’t have a widely accepted and well supported equivalent in the HTTP-as-application-protocol world yet. I just tried WCF‘s WSDL-to-code generation utility against the Amazon S3 WSDL (“svcutil http://s3.amazonaws.com/doc/2006-03-01/AmazonS3.wsdl”) and voila, I have code to help me start. Granted, it gives me an object-oriented interface which I dislike rather than a message-oriented one but the point is that I used a declarative description of the service as a tool to bootstrap my interaction. Now, when we start using WS-Policy and messaging-behaviour descriptions like SSDL the sky is the limit 🙂
Don’t get me wrong, I am not arguing against the HTTP-based mechanisms. Obviously we need both. I just missed the blogosphere discussions 🙂
I am embarking on a side project that involves memory and multimodal understanding for an…
I was in Toronto, Canada. I'm on the flight back home now. The trip was…
The BBC article "How we fell out of love with voice assistants" by Katherine Latham…
Like so many others out there, I played a bit with ChatGPT. I noticed examples…