Formal objection against [reference parameters]

I hadn’t noticed this. It’s been almost a month since this message was posted to the WS-Addressing mailing list. I had a break from following the WS-Addressing discussions since I thought that the work there was almost done. There was a formal objection against the current SOAP binding of the [reference parameters] element information item. The proposed solutions make sense, even though I’d still have preferred to see the element completely go. Interesting!

Recent Posts

Playing with graphs and neo4j

After my initial implementation of some BrainExpanded-related ideas on top of dgraph using its GraphQL…

3 weeks ago

A Graph Model DSL

Say hello to the Graph Model Domain Specific Language (GMDSL), created with the help of…

1 month ago

BrainExpanded – Web app and Data Sources

As I wrote in previous posts, the manual recording of memories for BrainExpanded is just…

2 months ago

BrainExpanded – End-to-end working

Imagine a world where your memory is enhanced by a team of intelligent agents, working…

2 months ago

BrainExpanded – Login State Caching Issue in iOS Share Extension

As part of the BrainExpanded project, I’m building an iOS app that lets users easily…

4 months ago

Is AI Good or Bad?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly evolved over the past few decades, becoming an integral part…

4 months ago