Steve, Mark, and Stefan on REST/WS

The discussion on REST/WS is still very much alive. There is an interesting thread of comments in Steve Vinoski‘s “WS references” post.

Note the references to “ProcessThis”. I wouldn’t have made the link between “ProcessMessage/This” with protocol handlers or interceptors in the same way that REST doesn’t link the transfer of state representation with HTTP GET. One is an architectural style concept while the other is an implementation technology which can be used to implement that concept. Very interesting discussion nevertheless.

(Thanks to Dilip for the link)

Recent Posts

DIY smart home accessory – It all started with a question to ChatGPT

Few months ago, we bought a sculpture from a local art fair for our Palm…

1 day ago

The Beginning of CVOYA

There’s a unique energy that comes with starting something new — a blend of excitement,…

2 months ago

Enhancements in Graph Model: Dynamic Entities & Full-Text Search

As I continued work on BrainExpanded and its MCP service, I came to realize that…

5 months ago

GraphModel: A .NET Abstraction for Graphs

Just over a month ago, I published "Playing with graphs and Neo4j". Back then, it…

6 months ago

Playing with graphs and neo4j

After my initial implementation of some BrainExpanded-related ideas on top of dgraph using its GraphQL…

7 months ago

A Graph Model DSL

Say hello to the Graph Model Domain Specific Language (GMDSL), created with the help of…

8 months ago