The discussion on REST/WS is still very much alive. There is an interesting thread of comments in Steve Vinoski‘s “WS references” post.
Note the references to “ProcessThis”. I wouldn’t have made the link between “ProcessMessage/This” with protocol handlers or interceptors in the same way that REST doesn’t link the transfer of state representation with HTTP GET. One is an architectural style concept while the other is an implementation technology which can be used to implement that concept. Very interesting discussion nevertheless.
(Thanks to Dilip for the link)
There’s a unique energy that comes with starting something new — a blend of excitement,…
As I continued work on BrainExpanded and its MCP service, I came to realize that…
Just over a month ago, I published "Playing with graphs and Neo4j". Back then, it…
After my initial implementation of some BrainExpanded-related ideas on top of dgraph using its GraphQL…
Say hello to the Graph Model Domain Specific Language (GMDSL), created with the help of…
As I wrote in previous posts, the manual recording of memories for BrainExpanded is just…