I absolutely agree…

… with Steve‘s comments about how the W3C TAG shouldn’t mandate a direct correlation between the wsa:To property and the underlying transport/application protocol-specific address. This would be similar to saying that every time I want to pay with my credit card by giving my credit card number, I have to tell the service provider how to communicate with my credit card company. I see SOAP messages travelling over arbitrary transport/application protocols (perhaps even as part of a single message exchange).

I want to build applications using SOAP without having to care about the semantics of what’s underneath. I perhaps care about the quality of service that the underlying protocols provide me (e.g. UDP vs TCP vs HTTP etc). However, such decisions may not have to be made until after I have developed my application.

Recent Posts

Playing with graphs and neo4j

After my initial implementation of some BrainExpanded-related ideas on top of dgraph using its GraphQL…

3 weeks ago

A Graph Model DSL

Say hello to the Graph Model Domain Specific Language (GMDSL), created with the help of…

1 month ago

BrainExpanded – Web app and Data Sources

As I wrote in previous posts, the manual recording of memories for BrainExpanded is just…

2 months ago

BrainExpanded – End-to-end working

Imagine a world where your memory is enhanced by a team of intelligent agents, working…

2 months ago

BrainExpanded – Login State Caching Issue in iOS Share Extension

As part of the BrainExpanded project, I’m building an iOS app that lets users easily…

4 months ago

Is AI Good or Bad?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly evolved over the past few decades, becoming an integral part…

4 months ago