It has been suggested in the WS-Addressing WG, as a proposal for the resolution of issue #i001, that the Endpoint Reference (EPR) Reference Properties/Parameters contain the interaction data rather than being part of an identity. I agree about the identity part; EPRs should not be treated as identities. However, I believe that interaction data should not be coupled with references; the solutions to addressing and interaction data should remain orthogonal. WS-Context is an example of how this could be done.
So, here’s some analysis and my proposal to the WS-Addressing WG.
There’s a unique energy that comes with starting something new — a blend of excitement,…
As I continued work on BrainExpanded and its MCP service, I came to realize that…
Just over a month ago, I published "Playing with graphs and Neo4j". Back then, it…
After my initial implementation of some BrainExpanded-related ideas on top of dgraph using its GraphQL…
Say hello to the Graph Model Domain Specific Language (GMDSL), created with the help of…
As I wrote in previous posts, the manual recording of memories for BrainExpanded is just…