Aaron Skonnard posted his WSE 3.0 wish list. I meant to add to his list more than a week ago but didn’t get the chance.
I will agree with Aaron’s and other people’s requests and I would like to add one of my own…
Currently, if you change the addressing information of a SoapEnvelope while in the filter pipeline, that addressing information is not used to create the transport channel. Ok, granted. You may want to include WS-Addressing headers in the envelope that do not reflect the transport actually used for the transfer but we should at least have a way to change the transport addressing stuff from within the filter pipeline. Perhaps a TransportContext.Current.Addressing class or something similar? Perhaps this is already supported and I have missed it. I wonder how/if this is done in Indigo.
Otherwise, the more WS-* protocols supported, the better.
Last week, I wrote about the evolution of the CVOYA Graph. After a lot of…
Last year, I released the "Graph Model" library for .NET as an open source project. It…
Today I'm pushing Spring Voyage out of the harbor. You can track its journey on…
In my last post, I wrote that "the typing of code was parallelized and delegated.…
In February, I wrote about the small team I'd stood up instead of hiring humans:…
Assembling a dream team without a single hire I've been making great progress on CVOYA's…