Aaron Skonnard posted his WSE 3.0 wish list. I meant to add to his list more than a week ago but didn’t get the chance.
I will agree with Aaron’s and other people’s requests and I would like to add one of my own…
Currently, if you change the addressing information of a SoapEnvelope while in the filter pipeline, that addressing information is not used to create the transport channel. Ok, granted. You may want to include WS-Addressing headers in the envelope that do not reflect the transport actually used for the transfer but we should at least have a way to change the transport addressing stuff from within the filter pipeline. Perhaps a TransportContext.Current.Addressing class or something similar? Perhaps this is already supported and I have missed it. I wonder how/if this is done in Indigo.
Otherwise, the more WS-* protocols supported, the better.
As 2025 is now behind us, I wanted to share a few reflections from my…
Few months ago, we bought a sculpture from a local art fair for our Palm…
There’s a unique energy that comes with starting something new — a blend of excitement,…
As I continued work on BrainExpanded and its MCP service, I came to realize that…
Just over a month ago, I published "Playing with graphs and Neo4j". Back then, it…
After my initial implementation of some BrainExpanded-related ideas on top of dgraph using its GraphQL…