Aaron Skonnard posted his WSE 3.0 wish list. I meant to add to his list more than a week ago but didn’t get the chance.
I will agree with Aaron’s and other people’s requests and I would like to add one of my own…
Currently, if you change the addressing information of a SoapEnvelope while in the filter pipeline, that addressing information is not used to create the transport channel. Ok, granted. You may want to include WS-Addressing headers in the envelope that do not reflect the transport actually used for the transfer but we should at least have a way to change the transport addressing stuff from within the filter pipeline. Perhaps a TransportContext.Current.Addressing class or something similar? Perhaps this is already supported and I have missed it. I wonder how/if this is done in Indigo.
Otherwise, the more WS-* protocols supported, the better.
As I wrote in previous posts, the manual recording of memories for BrainExpanded is just…
Imagine a world where your memory is enhanced by a team of intelligent agents, working…
As part of the BrainExpanded project, I’m building an iOS app that lets users easily…
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly evolved over the past few decades, becoming an integral part…
Happy New Year everyone! I was planning for my next BrainExpanded post to be a…
See "BrainExpanded - Introduction" for context on this post. Notes and links Over the years,…