Two new specs have been just released: WS-Transfer (the REST folks will have a field day with this) and WS-Enumeration.
Let me start with the second one first…
For the last few days I’ve been working on demonstrating how to implement “streaming” of messages in Web Services. I completed the WSE code for it and I was drafting a note with my experiences. Now there seems to be a protocol for it, which makes the work obsolete but at least relevant, so I plan to publish the notes anyway.
Now to WS-Transfer…
Why MS? Why? Why explicit modelling of resources in this way? Why the focus away from services? We are not talking about service-orientation anymore but about resource-orientation. WS-Addressing is no longer used as a reference to a service but, rather, as a reference to a resource, to an object. This would encourage people to think in terms of objects and not in terms of services. I need to study this specification more carefully but first impressions are not good.
I wonder whether this is another step from the companies to accommodate the Grid’s fascination with WS-RF. Hmmm.
I am embarking on a side project that involves memory and multimodal understanding for an…
I was in Toronto, Canada. I'm on the flight back home now. The trip was…
The BBC article "How we fell out of love with voice assistants" by Katherine Latham…
Like so many others out there, I played a bit with ChatGPT. I noticed examples…