And the discussion continues.
Following from Ted‘s blog entry, Steve Vinoskireplies. Also, following from Sean‘s “In a Swiss army knife, sometimes all you see is the knife” entry, Don Box gives his view in his “WSDL ?= IDL” post.
Also, Steve Loughran wonders whether “WSDL+CORBA=WSRF?”. I agree with Steve’s points but I would like to propose a slightly different formula: “WSRF=O-O with angle brackets”. I think this also captures the behaviours (i.e., resource lifetime management, coupling of resource identity with state and interface, resources as the building blocks of distributed applications rather than services) that WS-RF is introducing. See you in London Steve (I am buying the beers 🙂
There’s a unique energy that comes with starting something new — a blend of excitement,…
As I continued work on BrainExpanded and its MCP service, I came to realize that…
Just over a month ago, I published "Playing with graphs and Neo4j". Back then, it…
After my initial implementation of some BrainExpanded-related ideas on top of dgraph using its GraphQL…
Say hello to the Graph Model Domain Specific Language (GMDSL), created with the help of…
As I wrote in previous posts, the manual recording of memories for BrainExpanded is just…