I had to read this post a number of times to make sure that there wasn’t something I missed since I find myself agreeing with Mark 🙂 (just joking Mark… we’ve agreed before, I think :-).
A WSDL document will not tell you anything about the semantics of an “operation”. WSDL is a contract for the structure of the messages being exchanged. If one wishes to know about the semantics that may be associated with a particular WSDL document, they will have to go to the specification of the service described, find an RDF document for that service, call the service provider on the phone, ask the neighbour. WSDL is not yet another O-O IDL and it certainly does not carry any semantics about the service.
Other related posts: Three posts by Stefan Tilkov (post 1, post 2, post 3) and “WSDL Absolutely Isn’t Yet Another IDL” by Jim (BTW… Mark, Jim’s real blog is on the way).
There’s a unique energy that comes with starting something new — a blend of excitement,…
As I continued work on BrainExpanded and its MCP service, I came to realize that…
Just over a month ago, I published "Playing with graphs and Neo4j". Back then, it…
After my initial implementation of some BrainExpanded-related ideas on top of dgraph using its GraphQL…
Say hello to the Graph Model Domain Specific Language (GMDSL), created with the help of…
As I wrote in previous posts, the manual recording of memories for BrainExpanded is just…