Mark responds but we still disagree


Mark Baker comments on my recent entry about operation names in SOAP messages.

After talking to Jim for a bit, I realised that my comments didn’t come out in the way I intended. So, just to clarify… It’s not that I was objecting on services mapping messages to operations. That’s entirely their business. I was just glad that operation names are not mandatory in any way, since I believe that they encourage a particular programming model.

Recent Posts

BrainExpanded – The Timeline

See "BrainExpanded - Introduction" for context on this post. Notes and links Over the years,…

2 days ago

BrainExpanded – Introduction

This is the first post, in what I think is going to be a series,…

3 days ago

Digital twin follow up

Back in February, I shared the results of some initial experimentation with a digital twin.…

2 weeks ago

Digital Twin (my playground)

I am embarking on a side project that involves memory and multimodal understanding for an…

10 months ago

“This is exactly what LLMs are made for”

I was in Toronto, Canada. I'm on the flight back home now. The trip was…

1 year ago

AI is enhancing me

AI as an enhancer of human abilities.

1 year ago