Mark responds but we still disagree


Mark Baker comments on my recent entry about operation names in SOAP messages.

After talking to Jim for a bit, I realised that my comments didn’t come out in the way I intended. So, just to clarify… It’s not that I was objecting on services mapping messages to operations. That’s entirely their business. I was just glad that operation names are not mandatory in any way, since I believe that they encourage a particular programming model.

Recent Posts

How I Built My Own Team of AI Developers

Assembling a dream team without a single hire I've been making great progress on CVOYA's…

2 weeks ago

Reflecting on 2025: Building CVOYA’s Future with AI Coding Agents

As 2025 is now behind us, I wanted to share a few reflections from my…

2 months ago

DIY smart home accessory – It all started with a question to ChatGPT

Few months ago, we bought a sculpture from a local art fair for our Palm…

3 months ago

The Beginning of CVOYA

There’s a unique energy that comes with starting something new — a blend of excitement,…

5 months ago

Enhancements in Graph Model: Dynamic Entities & Full-Text Search

As I continued work on BrainExpanded and its MCP service, I came to realize that…

8 months ago

GraphModel: A .NET Abstraction for Graphs

Just over a month ago, I published "Playing with graphs and Neo4j". Back then, it…

9 months ago