What's going on (from twitter)

It has been suggested in the WS-Addressing WG, as a proposal for the resolution of issue #i001, that the Endpoint Reference (EPR) Reference Properties/Parameters contain the interaction data rather than being part of an identity. I agree about the identity part; EPRs should not be treated as identities. However, I believe that interaction data should not be coupled with references; the solutions to addressing and interaction data should remain orthogonal. WS-Context is an example of how this could be done.

So, here's some analysis and my proposal to the WS-Addressing WG.

Comments
#
You know my thoughts on this stuff, but pragmatically there's too much implementation/specification momentum built up around these things now. And then there's the fact that the "debate" in the committee is always restricted.
Posted by Mark Little (email) on Wed, 19 Jan, 2005 @ 22:45 UTC
#
It looks like RefProps have been removed. Yeah! http://www.markbaker.ca/2002/09/Blog/2005/01/19#2005-01-buh-bye-props
Posted by Mark Baker (email) on Thu, 20 Jan, 2005 @ 01:37 UTC
#
Damn Mark, you beat me to it ;-)
Posted by Mark Little (email) on Thu, 20 Jan, 2005 @ 01:46 UTC
Name:
Comment:
Antispam: Please type only the digits in "m93e62a4e"
Email:
URI:
Notify me of new comments